FPI Overnight Brief: August 6, 2009
Venezuela
The BBC reports that “Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has announced trade measures against Colombia, amid a growing diplomatic row between the two nations. Mr. Chavez said he would halt the import of 10,000 cars from Colombia and ban a Colombian energy firm from Venezuela's oil-rich region. Last week, Mr Chavez recalled his envoy from Bogota over accusations that Venezuela had sold arms to Farc rebels.”
Dow Jones reports that “Venezuela's president said Wednesday that a plan to put additional U.S. troops in Colombia is aimed at a possible attack on Venezuela to get its huge oil reserves. ‘We are glad to share our oil right now with everyone including the U.S., but if [the U.S.] invades ... there will not be oil for anyone,’ Hugo Chavez said during a press conference. The plan announced by Colombia last month to let additional U.S. troops operate on Colombian military bases, is ostensibly designed to ramp up the fight against drugs. But Chavez said the real reason for more troops in Venezuela 's next door neighbor is so the U.S. can inch closer to Venezuela's oil. ‘For the empire [the U.S.], this is what they want, oil,’ he said. Petroleum, he said, is the reason ‘the Yankees’ attacked Iraq, and it is why they now have Iran and Venezuela in their sights.”
The AP reports that “Venezuela's journalist association urged the nation's top prosecutor to resign Wednesday for proposing legislation to punish yet-to-be defined ‘media crimes.’ Lawmakers say the bill suggested by Attorney General Louisa Ortega has not yet been drafted. But Roger Santodomingo, the journalist association's secretary-general, warned ‘it could reappear at any moment with all its perverse intent to criminalize journalism.’ ‘We're asking her to resign, because the person meant to defend the law can't propose a law that is fundamentally unconstitutional,’ Santodomingo told reporters. Last week, Ortega called on lawmakers to punish media that cause ‘panic’ or present a ‘false perception of the facts.’ She urged the National Assembly, which is controlled by allies of President Hugo Chavez, to take her suggestions into account as they consider a new law.”
Afghanistan
The Washington Times reports that “The top U.S. uniformed military officer Wednesday offered a bleak assessment of the war in Afghanistan, saying that years of neglect before the Obama administration had starved the U.S.-led effort of funds and diplomatic heft - a condition he called ‘a culture of poverty.’ Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told editors and reporters at The Washington Times that nearly eight years after the war began, the U.S. military is still digging its way ‘out of a hole’ and has not reached ‘year zero’ in the campaign to turn back Taliban advances and gain the trust of the Afghan people.”
The AP reports that “Defense Secretary Robert Gates, asking that ‘a few other ideas’ be taken into account, has extended the deadline for an assessment of how to turn around the war in Afghanistan, an official said Wednesday. The report had been expected next week and now may come in late August or early September, Defense Department spokesman Geoff Morrell said. Officials said last week that a draft of the assessment called for changes in the way troops operate and that after the report was finished commanders were likely to ask for more U.S. forces.”
Georgia
Mikheil Saakashvili writes in the Washington Post that “Russian provocations have not stopped; snipers in Russian-controlled areas have killed 28 Georgian policemen. In recent days, Moscow has engaged in a series of provocative acts and statements, echoing its prelude to last year's invasion. Even as the world watches, Moscow has vetoed monitoring missions from the United Nations and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. In violation of the cease-fire, Russia also denies European Union monitors access to the occupied territories. Despite all this, and contrary to some expectations, Georgia has rebounded. Our democratic institutions are growing. Foreign investors are returning. The world should recognize that the kind of behavior Russia exhibited last August threatens not only Georgia but our entire region.”
Reuters reports that “Georgia on August 5 dismissed as a 'myth' Russian accusations that it was aggressively rearming and said it was in contact with ally Washington to defuse tensions over rebel South Ossetia. Russia crushed a Georgian assault on the breakaway territory in August last year, and tensions have grown ahead of the August 7 first war anniversary, with accusations from both sides of gun and mortar fire on South Ossetia's border. Moscow on August 5 again expressed concern that Georgia was rearming with Western help, but said it did not believe the former Soviet republic was capable of launching another offensive against South Ossetia.”
The AP reports that “Despite rising tensions and slashing rhetoric as the first anniversary of the Russian war approaches, top officials in Tbilisi and Moscow downplay the likelihood of renewed fighting — but for deeply different reasons. The deputy chief of Russia's general staff says Georgia is too weak after the war that devastated its military and caused an estimated $1 billion damage to the struggling country. Georgia's national security adviser, however, says the danger of new fighting appears low because of ‘preventive diplomacy’ and because Russia knows a new war would undermine its influence among neighbors and rapprochement with the West. In the two weeks ahead of the Friday anniversary of the start of the war, Georgia and Russia have accused each other of preparing for new hostilities by allegedly launching small attacks in and around South Ossetia, the separatist region that was the war's flashpoint.”
Stephen Sestanovich writes in the Washington Post: “The administration has a good story to tell about the Russian-American relationship it is trying to build. Can it say as much about what it is doing to bolster Russia's neighbors? It's silly to suggest that Russia's weak banking system or declining population or any of its other internal problems might keep it from pummeling Georgia again if the opportunity arose. Yet there are forces at work of a very different kind that favor U.S. interests. Almost all the states of the former Soviet Union are already working with Western governments, and with each other, to increase their independence from Moscow. When Kyrgyzstan lets the United States keep using its air base to reach Afghanistan despite Russian bribes; when Uzbekistan refuses to join a rapid-reaction military force that Russia wants to create; when Turkmenistan invites American and European companies to help break Gazprom's grip on its energy exports; when the president of Armenia invites the president of Georgia (who is still denounced by Moscow as a genocidal murderer) to receive an award -- all in the space of a few months, it's clear that the geopolitical tide is moving in the right direction.”
North Korea
The Wall Street Journal reports that “North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, in more than three hours of discussions with Bill Clinton in Pyongyang, drew the former U.S. president into a wide-ranging discussion of security and regional issues. Former U.S. officials and diplomats say the meetings, attended by the top ranks of Pyongyang's security establishment, were part of a renewed campaign by Pyongyang to stimulate direct negotiations with Washington over the country's nuclear program. President Barack Obama and his aides stressed Wednesday that they weren't viewing Mr. Clinton's trip as anything more than a humanitarian mission focused on securing the release of two detained American journalists, Euna Lee and Laura Ling.”
John Podhoretz writes on Commentary’s blog Contentions: “In the end, the United States had few options when it came to the matter of the two television reporters who had been arrested and tried as spies for attempting to sneak into North Korea…If, in the end, the bribe that secured the release of Laura Ling and Euna Lee was the visit of an ex-president and a photo-op of said ex-president with a clearly thrilled Kim Jong-il, that was a decent deal under the circumstances. It is doubtful, however, that Clinton’s visit was all it took; we should get a better sense of it in the days to come, and we should gird ourselves for the news of the deal when it comes. That said, and now that they are out of jeopardy, Ling and Lee deserve to be held accountable, at least in the realm of public opinion, for the unthinkably bad judgment they displayed in their preposterous, vainglorious, and astoundingly naive venture.”
Reuters reports that “When billionaire Steve Bing heard his friend Bill Clinton was embarking on a mission to free US journalists in North Korea, Mr Bing offered his jet.”
Stephen Yates and Christian Whiton, an FPI Policy Advisor, write in the Wall Street Journal that “Mr. Clinton’s visit has continued the pattern of rewarding Pyongyang for bad behavior. Instead, the U.S. and its allies should counter the growing threat by recalibrating strategic defense and deterrence in the region by creating a formal planning group... America’s possession of nuclear weapons is often taken as an ample deterrent in and of itself. Select allies are assured that they stand beneath a U.S. nuclear umbrella. But this counts for little if the relevant systems, training and authorities to use force in practice are not established in advance of a crisis. The situation today is similar to that of the early 1960s, when some European allies doubted the will and ability of the U.S. to retaliate rapidly in reaction to a Soviet attack—and thus to deter such an attack in the first place. Because deterrence lacked specificity and credibility, NATO established the Nuclear Planning Group… A similar defensive step is necessary today… America and its allies need a Nuclear and Strategic Planning Group for East Asia, starting with Japan and then including other democratic countries.”
Ideas
Fouad Ajami writes in the Wall Street Journal that “Now the Arabs are face to face with their own history. Instead of George W. Bush there is Barack Hussein Obama, an American leader pledged to a foreign policy of 'realism.' The Arabs express fondness for the new American president. In his fashion (and in the fashion of their world and their leaders, it has to be said) President Obama gave the Arabs a speech in Cairo two months ago. It was a moment of theater and therapy. The speech delivered, the foreign visitor was gone. He had put another marker on the globe, another place to which he had taken his astounding belief in his biography and his conviction that another foreign population had been wooed by his oratory and weaned away from anti-Americanism. The crowd could tell itself that the new standard-bearer of the Pax Americana was a man who understood its concerns, but the embattled modernists and the critics of autocracy knew better. There is no mistaking the animating drive of the new American policy in that Greater Middle East: realism and benign neglect, the safety of the status quo rather than the risks of liberty.”
Pakistan
The Los Angeles Times reports that “Pakistan has had its hands full waging war against a Taliban insurgency. Now another troubling crisis simmers. Last week, riots broke out in Gojra, a city of 150,000 in the eastern province of Punjab, after accusations surfaced that Christians at a wedding ceremony had desecrated a copy of the holy Koran. Police say the accusations were unfounded. Nevertheless, Muslims attacked Christian enclaves in Gojra on July 30 and again Saturday. The second outbreak turned out to be far worse: A mob of more than 1,000 people set fire to more than 40 Christian homes in a warren called Christian Town… Members of a militant group seized on the accusations to incite Muslims to attack Christian neighborhoods, government officials say. After attackers set fire to Christian homes in the initial violence last week, police had ample time to assert control, but instead allowed street rallies to mushroom into riots.”
Iran
Reuters reports that “Iran now appears almost certain to miss President Barack Obama's September deadline to respond to his diplomatic overtures, but it seems equally unlikely Washington will rush to impose tougher sanctions. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was sworn into office on Wednesday, greatly weakened and facing questions about his political future after a disputed election that sparked the worst unrest since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. ‘To think that at the same time as putting together his cabinet in the midst of the largest uprising since the Iranian revolution, and oh by the way, figure out a way to respond to the United States, that is just not going to happen,’ said Reza Aslan, an Iran expert and author in Los Angeles.”
The New York Times reports that “With his adversaries boycotting the ceremony and a vast deployment of police officers standing guard outside, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was sworn into office on Wednesday for a second term as president, almost two months after an election that divided the nation and set off Iran’s deepest crisis since the Islamic Revolution 30 years ago. There were scattered protests in the streets around the Parliament building in Tehran, where the ceremony took place. But with thousands of riot police officers and Basij militia members patrolling the capital, the million-strong rally called for by the opposition failed to materialize. The inauguration ceremony itself exposed deep rifts in Iran’s ruling elite. Many seats were empty, with most of Parliament’s reform faction boycotting the event, according to Parlamaan News, a reformist Web site. Several reformists who did attend walked out as the president began his speech. Leading opposition figures, including the presidential candidate Mir Hussein Moussavi and the former presidents Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami, also stayed away.”
Africa
The Wall Street Journal editorializes: “Though overshadowed by hubby Bill’s rescue mission to Pyongyang, Hillary Clinton is in Africa speaking some useful truths. The Secretary of State’s seven-country jaunt began yesterday in Kenya, where she took aim at political corruption and graft. A disputed 2007 election resulted in a power sharing deal between President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga, but not before related violence claimed more than 1,000 lives. ‘The absence of strong, effective democratic institutions has permitted ongoing corruption, impunity, politically motivated violence, human-rights abuses and a lack of respect for the rule of law,’ Mrs. Clinton said at a press conference. ‘These conditions helped fuel the post-election violence and they are continuing to hold Kenya back.’”
The Washington Post reports that “Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton began a major trip to Africa on Wednesday by publicly urging Kenya, a strategic U.S. ally, to move faster to resolve tensions lingering from a disputed 2007 election that precipitated the country's worst crisis since it gained independence. Clinton went further in a meeting with Kenyan leaders, urging them to fire the attorney general and the police chief, who have been accused of ignoring dozens of killings carried out by police death squads, according to a senior U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the meeting was private. Clinton also raised the possibility of banning some Kenyan officials from traveling to the United States if the government does not move more quickly to prosecute those responsible for post-election ethnic violence that left 1,300 people dead. The organizers are widely suspected to include senior officials and cabinet ministers, many of whom have family members in the United States.”
Overnight Brief
The Latest
Mission Statement
The Foreign Policy Initiative seeks to promote an active U.S. foreign policy committed to robust support for democratic allies, human rights, a strong American military equipped to meet the challenges of the 21st century, and strengthening America’s global economic competitiveness.
Read More