- Home
- Topics
- Publications
- Multimedia
- Briefings
- Press Room
- Events
- Young Professionals
Gen Merrill McPeak (USAF ret.) writes: Armies have to care about what succeeds in war. Sometimes they win or lose because of material factors, because one side has the greater numbers or better equipment. But armies are sure to lose if they pay no attention to the ideas that succeed in battle. Unit cohesion is one such idea. We know, or ought to, that warriors are inspired by male bonding, by comradeship, by the knowledge that they survive only through relying on each other. To undermine cohesion is to endanger everyone. I know some will see these ingredients of the military lifestyle as a sort of absurd, tough-guy game played by overgrown boys. But to prepare warriors for a life of hardship, the military must remain a kind of adventure, apart from the civilian world and full of strange customs. To be a fighter pilot or a paratrooper or a submariner is to join a self-contained, resolutely idealistic society, largely unnoticed and surprisingly uncorrupted by the world at large. I do not see how permitting open homosexuality in these communities enhances their prospects of success in battle. Indeed, I believe repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” will weaken the warrior culture at a time when we have a fight on our hands. – New York Times
Brief Topic:
Defense
SIGN UP
Sign up to receive FPI emails, including the FPI Overnight Brief, a concise daily compendium of essential foreign policy information and analysis.
Featured Video
Follow FPI
FPI on your site
FPI is Reading
- AfPak Channel on Foreign Policy
- AsiaEye from Project 2049
- Breitbart
- AEI Center for Defense Studies
- Checkpoint Washington
- Contentions
- The Commentator
- Critical Threats Project from AEI
- Democracy Digest Bulletin
- Drudge Report
- Economist's Eastern Approaches
- Elliott Abrams Pressure Points