FPI Overnight Brief: February 23, 2010
The War
The nation’s main counterterrorism center, created in response to the intelligence failures in the years before Sept. 11, is struggling because of flawed staffing and internal cultural clashes, according to a new study financed by Congress. The result, the study concludes, is a lack of coordination and communication among the agencies that are supposed to take the lead in planning the fight against terrorism, including the C.I.A. and the State Department…[T]he new report found that the center’s planning arm did not have enough authority to do its main job of coordinating the White House’s counterterrorism priorities. The center’s planning operation is supposed to be staffed by representatives of various agencies, but not all of them send their best and brightest, the report said. It also cited examples in which the C.I.A. and the State Department did not even participate in some plans developed by the center that were later criticized for lacking important insights those agencies could offer. As a result, the center’s planning arm “has been forced to develop national plans without the expertise of some of the most important players,” the report determined. – New York Times
A senior member of al Qaeda's Yemen wing who the Yemeni government said it killed has emerged on an internet forum, threatening to carry out attacks in the United States. Yemen declared an open war on al Qaeda on its territory last month after the group's regional off-shoot claimed responsibility for a failed bomb attack on a Detroit-bound plane in December that grabbed the world's attention. "Today, you have attacked us in the middle of our household, so wait for what will befall you in the middle of yours ... We will blow up the earth from beneath your feet," Qasim al-Raymi, the wing's military commander, said in an article posted earlier this month on a website used by Islamist militants. Yemen said in January it had killed six regional militant leaders in air strikes, but al Qaeda later denied this, and other senior members Sanaa had said were dead, such as deputy leader Saeed al-Shehri, have since re-emerged on websites used by Islamist militants. – Reuters
In another blow to the Taliban senior leadership, Pakistani authorities have captured Mullah Abdul Kabir, a member of the group’s inner circle and a leading military commander against American forces in eastern Afghanistan, according to a Pakistani intelligence official. Mullah Kabir was detained several days ago in Nawshera, in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier Province, the Pakistani official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Mullah Kabir is a member of the Quetta Shura, the small group of leaders who direct the Taliban’s operations and who report to Mullah Muhammad Omar, the group’s founder…The capture of Mullah Kabir appeared to be a strictly Pakistani operation, and Pakistani officials appeared to be keeping Mullah Kabir’s arrest a closely held secret, even from their American allies. Mullah Kabir is a longtime associate of Mullah Omar, the Taliban’s founder. He was the governor of Nangarhar Province, in eastern Afghanistan, when the Taliban ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. Since then, he has overseen military operations in eastern Afghanistan, including those in Kunar, Nangarhar, Nuristan and Laghman Provinces. – New York Times
Hajji Zaman Ghamsharik, the Afghan
warlord accused of helping Osama bin Laden escape from the Americans at Tora
Bora, had so many enemies that his assassination on Monday came as no
particular surprise. What was a surprise was the manner of Hajji Zaman’s death:
by a suicide bomber wearing an explosive vest, who killed him and 14 others as
they gathered at a ceremony to distribute land to returning refugees at a
village in his tribal stomping grounds near the eastern city of
Jalalabad...Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan are usually quick to take
responsibility for suicide bombings. Not in this case; when asked about Hajji
Zaman’s killing, the usually garrulous Taliban spokesman, Zabiullah Mujahid,
said he did not know who did it. – New
York Times
The top U.S. commander in Baghdad
said some American combat forces could remain in Iraq after this summer's
planned withdrawal date if the country's feuding leaders are unable to quickly
form a new government…Speaking at the Pentagon, Gen. Odierno said he expected
all U.S. combat forces to leave Iraq by Sept. 1, reducing American troop
levels—already at their lowest point since the start of the war in March
2003—to 50,000. He said the continuing withdrawal was ahead of schedule, as
initial plans had estimated there would be 115,000 U.S. troops left in Iraq now
instead of the current 96,000. Still, Gen. Odierno he said, Iraq's uncertain
political future meant the next phase of the drawdown could proceed more slowly
than initially planned. The commander said he had prepared contingency plans
that would leave some combat troops in Iraq past Sept. 1 if the country faced
serious political unrest or widespread violence after the vote. "I have
contingency plans that I've briefed to the chain of command this week that we
could execute if we run into problems," Gen. Odierno said. "We're
prepared to execute those." – Wall
Street Journal
Chris Harnisch writes: The U.S. State Department made the grudgingly painful yet correct decision to cut humanitarian aid to Somalia, and it must continue to ward off the pressure and criticism thrown its away by the United Nations. Unfortunately though, the suffering of the Somali people will continue and the U.S. will remain at risk until the Obama administration recognizes the severity of the threat posed by al Shabaab and develops a comprehensive strategy to mitigate that threat. – The Weekly Standard Blog
The civilian chief of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization said he doesn't believe a Dutch decision to withdraw its nearly 2,000 troops from southern Afghanistan this year will lead other European allies to follow suit. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO secretary-general, said that the collapse of the Dutch government on Saturday, which will likely prevent the Netherlands from extending its troop presence beyond this summer, was a unique situation and that the rest of the alliance remained committed to the Afghan mission. "The political situation in the Netherlands is so particular that it should be seen as an isolated political event that will not have an impact on other allies and partners," Mr. Rasmussen said in an interview Monday. "I have a sense of strong solidarity within the alliance." Other European governments gave no sign Monday they would use the Dutch developments as a pretext to pull out their troops from the country. – Wall Street Journal
U.S. Special Operations Forces ordered an airstrike that killed at least 27 civilians in southern Afghanistan and the soldiers may not have satisfied rules of engagement designed to avoid the killing of innocents, Afghan and coalition officials said Monday. The airstrike Sunday hit a group of minibuses in a remote part of the south near the border between Uruzgan and Daykundi provinces. The area is hundreds of miles from Marjah, where the largest allied offensive since 2001 is now in its second week. But the airstrike nonetheless illustrated one of the major problems for coalition forces as they try to win over civilians in Marjah and across Afghanistan: figuring out who is a civilian and who is an insurgent—and not killing the civilians. – Wall Street Journal
The Afghan official responsible for governing Marja paid his first visit to this strife-torn community Monday, imploring residents to forsake the Taliban and promising employment programs as an inducement for local men to put down their weapons. Haji Zahir, the newly appointed mayor of Marja, told a group of about 50 elderly men who had gathered at a gas station near the main bazaar that the large U.S. and Afghan military operation to flush out the Taliban is intended to bring "positive changes." "They're not here to occupy our country," he said of the U.S. Marines who now control key commercial and residential sections of Marja. "They're just here to bring you peace." But Zahir, a native of southern Afghanistan who has spent the past 15 years in Germany, elicited only a tepid endorsement from the men who gathered to meet him. Their questions made clear that the Taliban still enjoys deep support here, and that the Afghan government is almost universally loathed, illuminating the deep challenge facing Marines and civilian stabilization specialists as they try to establish basic civic administration. – Washington Post
Afghanistan
The Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, has unilaterally taken control of the country's top electoral watchdog, provoking outrage from western diplomats, the Guardian has learnt. The Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC), which forced Karzai into a runoff election after it disqualified nearly 1m fraudulent votes in last year's presidential election, previously included three foreign experts named by the UN. However, according to a new presidential decree published today, Karzai will have the exclusive power to appoint all five panel members. His decision to "Afghanise" the ECC came while parliament was in recess. It provoked a shocked reaction from western diplomats, who fear parliamentary elections – due to take place in six months – will be fatally undermined by a repeat of last year's electoral fraud. – Guardian
Iran
Iran said on Tuesday it was willing to swap low-grade for high-grade uranium but that the nuclear fuel exchange under a U.N.-brokered plan must be carried out on its own territory…"In order to bring about a constructive interaction, we have declared our readiness for fuel swap, provided it is done within the country (Iran)," foreign ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said. "We are prepared for a fuel swap even though we do not regard this condition of supplying fuel to the Tehran research reactor through a swap as correct." - Reuters
America's top military officer, after returning from a trip to the Middle East, said he was worried about the "unintended consequences" of an attack on Iran's nuclear program. Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon on Monday, Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Iran's path toward building a nuclear weapon was an overarching concern from all the countries he visited. Those countries include Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. "Let me be clear: We owe [Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates] and [President Obama] a range of options for this threat. We owe the American people our readiness," Adm. Mullen said. "But, as I have said many times, I worry a lot about the unintended consequences of any sort of military action. For now, the diplomatic and the economic levers of international power are, and ought to be, the levers first pulled." – Washington Times
Gen. Chuck Wald (ret.) writes: The military has a role to play in solving this problem, possibly without having to fire a single shot. A lack of serious public discussion of the military tools available to the United States and its allies has put us at a disadvantage. Any mention of military options is often met with accusations of warmongering or concerns about sharing sensitive information. Yet, it is precisely a public commitment to military action that might preclude the need for one…It is time for a credible military option to be put back on the table. Not to use it yet, but to make clear beyond any doubt that America is prepared, if necessary, to use force to disarm the regime of Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It is only with the military stick hovering in the background that any negotiations have the possibility to dissuade Iran from continuing along its dangerous course. – New York Daily News
Richard Grenell writes: Team Obama has spent the year dithering and hoping that doing nothing would allow the opposition inside Iran time to peacefully bring down Ahmadinejad's government. But while the Obama team nervously talks among themselves, they have missed the opportunity to make the Internet available to the thousands of student protesters inside Iran or to implement harsh sanctions on the government that could push Ahmadinejad over the cliff and deliver the fatal blow to his presidency. The Obama administration should cease making the old, tired claim that American involvement would undermine the opposition by playing into the hands of Ahmadinejad's re-cycled message that this is an American CIA coup on his presidency…The lack of Obama leadership and assistance to the opposition inside Iran is now prohibiting the fall of a dictatorship on the brink. – Huffington Post
Defying a harsh crackdown on political protesters in Iran, one of the country’s most outspoken opposition leaders on Monday called for a national referendum to gauge the popularity of the government. The proposal from the leader, Mehdi Karroubi, was publicized on Iranian opposition Web sites after he had met with another opposition figure, Mir Hussein Moussavi, at Mr. Karroubi’s home in Tehran. Both men ran for president in the election last June and contend that the victory of the incumbent, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was a result of pervasive fraud. It was clear from Mr. Karroubi’s call for a referendum that he did not expect the government to take it seriously. But his ability even to make such a demand and spread the message over the Internet seemed calculated to frustrate the Iranian authorities. – New York Times
FPI Executive Director Jamie Fly writes: In sum, Iran is laying the groundwork required to eventually pursue a weapons capability on relatively short notice (the Institute for Science and International Security estimates that they would now only need six months using the LEU they have produced at Natanz) to produce enough HEU for a weapon. Thursday's IAEA report implies that they may not require significant additional work to produce the warhead itself. This timeline, of course, assumes they are not already producing LEU or highly enriched uranium (HEU) at a covert facility. Although some experts may quibble with the terminology, it appears that an incremental breakout is underway. The Iranians are methodically preparing the capabilities needed to produce a weapon, all the while suffering few consequences. – Shadow Government
Anne Applebaum writes: Many Israelis regard the Iranian nuclear program as a matter of life and death. The prospect of a nuclear Iran isn't an irritant or a distant threat. It is understood directly in the context of the Iranian president's provocative attacks on Israel's right to exist and his public support for historians who deny the Holocaust. If you want to make Israelis paranoid, hint that they might be the target of an attempted mass murder. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad does exactly that. If that ever happened, then the 2 a.m. phone call would be followed by retaliation, some of which would be directed at us, our troops in Iraq, our ships at sea. I don't want this to happen -- but I do want us to be prepared if it does. Contrary to Palin, I do not think Obama would restore the fortunes of his presidency by bombing Iran, like a character out of that movie "Wag the Dog." But I do hope that this administration is ready, militarily and psychologically, not for a war of choice but for an unwanted war of necessity. This is real life, after all, not Hollywood. – Washington Post
Turkey
Turkish anti-terrorism police Monday arrested more than a dozen senior retired and serving military officers in a sweep linked to a massive case against the country's so-called "deep state," which for decades wielded power over elected governments…The 40-plus detentions in major cities across the country included former heads of the air force and navy, and were made in connection with a lurid alleged 2003 coup plot known as "Sledgehammer." Among those arrested Monday were Gen. Ýbrahim Fýrtýna, former Air Force commander; Admiral Özden Örnek, a former head of the Navy, and two former heads of the 1st Army, based in Istanbul, Generals Ergin Saygun and Çetin Do?an, according to Anadolu Ajansi , the state news agency. The 2003 plot, as outlined by the liberal daily newspaper Tarat in a January report, included plans to blow up mosques during crowded Friday prayers in Istanbul's devout Fatih and Beyazit districts, and another to down a Turkish aircraft over Greek airspace. The operations were designed to undermine the ruling Justice and Development party and create an atmosphere conducive to a coup, according to Taraf. – Wall Street Journal
Defense
Amy Butler reports: In a stunning reversal Feb. 19, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz told reporters that a Joint Strike Fighter cost overrun is "possible, maybe even likely." This is only a few short weeks after he expressed more optimism that a breach of the Nunn McCurdy statute was not likely. Apparently, like Defense Secretary Robert Gates said during his Feb. 1 budget briefing, Schwartz says he now knows more about the program. Lockheed Martin officials continue to say the cost of the aircraft is coming in under the predicted costs of the most recent selected acquisition report (SAR -- a cost report that informs Congress of major shifts to pricing of Pentagon programs). The next SAR goes to Congress in March, and it is looking more and more likely that a "critical" breach will occur. This means that either the APUC (average per unit cost -- the total procurement cost divided by the procurement quantity) or the PAUC (program acquisition unit cost -- the cost of procurement, development and construction divided by the total procurement quantity) exceeds the original baseline price by 50%. - Ares
Tom Mahnken writes: Given the
enduring importance of nuclear weapons in U.S. national security, the
administration's request for additional funding for the U.S. nuclear weapons
infrastructure is a welcome development…In the end, however, the
administration's budget request is but a partial solution. The United States is
the only nuclear power that is not modernizing its arsenal, and neither the
administration nor Congress shows any inclination to change that fact. The
newest weapons on the U.S. arsenal were designed decades ago, and the expertise
to design new ones represents a critical shortfall. Absent modernization, the
United States will eventually face the prospect of unilateral nuclear
disarmament. – Shadow
Government
Josh Rogin reports: In an unprecedented display of Japanese concern about U.S. nuclear plans, more than 200 Japanese parliamentarians have written to President Obama asking him to drastically alter the U.S. approach to nuclear weapons..."We strongly desire that the United States immediately adopt a declaratory policy stating that the ‘sole purpose' of U.S. nuclear weapons is to deter others from using such weapons," said the letter, which Japanese lawmakers hand delivered to U.S. Ambassador John Roos on Feb. 19. - The Cable
Iraq
A series of bombings, beheadings and shootings rippled through Iraq on Monday, leaving at least 23 people dead, including 9 children, and intensifying concern about a spike in violence with less than two weeks until national elections. The authorities detected no discernible pattern to the violence, with rockets exploding in Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone, car bombings aimed at government buildings, assassinations of security officers and government officials and the killings of two families in their homes in Baghdad. – New York Times
Russia
For a few days this month, Moscow political circles were transfixed by a rather exotic spectacle: the leader of an opposition party was criticizing Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin. This was not just any leader. It was Sergei M. Mironov, whose career in the opposition has been distinguished by passionate loyalty to Mr. Putin…Many observers long ago wrote off A Just Russia as “pocket opposition,” devised to give the appearance of political competition where none existed. So it came as a surprise when Mr. Mironov, who Mr. Putin installed as speaker of the upper house of Parliament, told the television talk show host Vladimir V. Pozner that it was “outdated information to say that we, and personally I, have supported Vladimir Putin in everything,” noting that the party members “categorically opposed” Mr. Putin’s budget. Mr. Pozner was taken aback — “nobody in that position has said anything negative about Putin,” he said later — and watched with real curiosity to see if officials at state-controlled Channel One would edit out the remark before it was broadcast in Moscow. They did not. – New York Times
China
China's technology ministry moved to tighten controls on Internet use Tuesday, saying individuals who want to operate Web sites must first meet in person with regulators. The state-sanctioned group that registers domain names in China froze registrations for new individual Web sites in December after state media complained that not enough was being done to check whether sites provided pornographic content. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said that ban was being lifted, but would-be operators would now have submit their identity cards and photos of themselves as well as meet in person with regulators and representatives of service providers before their sites could be registered. It said the rule was aimed at cracking down on pornography. – Associated Press
Richard Samuelson writes: As
China becomes an ever more important player in world affairs, the clash between
the liberal regimes of the West and China will continue. The conflict will not
end until either the U.S. or China changes fundamentally. Ultimately, the very
existence of the Chinese regime, as it is currently constituted and as it
understands itself, is irreconcilable with the idea of a truly private sector,
one with freedoms of expression and religion. As the regime sees it, China
cannot accept the free flow of ideas, information, and goods and still be
China. – National
Review Online
Europe/Russia
Denmark's prime minister announced a major government shake-up Tuesday, changing more than a dozen Cabinet posts including the ministers of defense, justice and foreign affairs to build his own team 10 months after taking office. The reshuffle - which put women in charge of the defense and foreign ministries for the first time - had been widely expected since Lars Loekke Rasmussen took over as leader of the center-right government in April. He replaced former prime minister and Liberal Party colleague Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who became NATO secretary-general. No major changes were expected in government policy, as the minority Liberal-Conservative Cabinet commands majority support in Parliament with the backing of the anti-immigration Danish People's Party and a smaller centrist group. – Associated Press
Stephen Schwartz writes:
Americans should pay attention to the unfortunate outcome of UN-EU-OSCE rule in
the Balkans, since the abdication of global responsibility proposed by the
Obama administration is predicated on a greater world-wide role for these
increasingly-discredited international organizations. Kosovo’s independence
should be guaranteed, to defeat radical Islamists who have returned to the
Balkans as a theatre for their malign operations, as well as to hold the line against
Russian scheming in the region. America made a promise to the Kosovars, and the
Kosovars believe that America keeps its promises. The Kosovars should not see
their hope in our integrity disappointed. It's time for EULEX to go
home. – The
Weekly Standard Blog
Ivan Kratsev writes: Unlike the days of the Cold War, foreign and security policy in Western Europe is not outside the sidelines from domestic political games. In the days of the Cold War, the foreign policy was too important and politicians preferred to keep it out of normal politicking. In the post-Cold War period with the disappearance of the Soviet threat, foreign policy became important enough for electoral purposes…If this trend continues, we can expect that foreign policy will be at the center of populist posturing, and NATO’s appeal for unity and responsibility will have no effect. In short, in the age of populism, NATO will find it more and more difficult to sustain political support for out-of-area missions. And this challenge to NATO's new role should be seriously thought through in the new strategic concept of the alliance. – World Affairs Journal
Americas
Laura Rozen reports: Back from a quick trip last week to assess recovery and relief efforts from Haiti's January 12th earthquake, two Senate staffers released this Senate Foreign Relations Committee trip report, highlighting immediate shelter and sanitation concerns and expressing concern about the coordination of Washington's U.S. government response to Haiti. While they say the coordination of the U.S. country team on the ground in Haiti appears effective, the Senate staffers express concern about coordination of the effort from the USG in Washington. - Politico
A British oil rig started drilling in disputed
waters off the Falkland Islands on Monday, as Argentina tried to rally support
from Latin American nations for a diplomatic statement backing Argentina's
claim to the islands and criticizing the U.K. for violating Argentine
sovereignty...If Britain finds large amounts of oil, relations could get
stickier. Following a three-month journey from Scotland, the oil-drilling rig
Ocean Guardian sank its initial well Monday, said a spokesman for Desire
Petroleum PLC, one of four small exploration companies that have contracted the
rig to drill as many as 10 wells. Analysts say excitement in the investor
community is mixed with caution. "It's reasonably high risk, since we have
no commercial discoveries out there," said Peter Hitchens, an analyst at
brokerage firm Panmure Gordon. – Wall
Street Journal
Argentina cemented a Latin American
front over the Falklands yesterday as a British oil rig began drilling in the
disputed seas around the islands. Regional leaders at the Rio Group
summit in Mexico were expected to sign up for a resolution backing Argentina in
its escalating row with Britain after Brazil and Chile pledged their support.
Venezuela’s vociferous President, Hugo Chávez, set the tone of the
summit, offering military support. Characterising Britain as an imperialist
relic, Mr Chávez demanded the return of "Las Malvinas", as they are
known to Argentinians. - Times
of London
Horn of Africa
A U.S. Navy warship prevented an attack on a Tanzanian ship and apprehended eight suspected pirates in the process, the U.S. Embassy in Tanzania said on Tuesday. USS Farragut dispatched an SH-60B Seahawk helicopter to MV Barakaale 1 after it raised a distress call saying it was under attack from a gang on a skiff, the embassy said in a statement. "The helicopter then stopped the ... skiff as it attempted to speed away, by firing warning shots across its bow," it said. "A boarding team from USS Farragut boarded the vessel and the eight suspected pirates were taken aboard the Farragut." bThe statement did not say when and where the incident occurred, nor give the pirates' nationalities. The USS Farragut is a guided missile destroyer and part of Combined Task Force 151 that patrols the Gulf of Aden and the east coast of Somalia. - Reuters
SIGN UP
Sign up to receive FPI emails, including the FPI Overnight Brief, a concise daily compendium of essential foreign policy information and analysis.
Featured Video
Follow FPI
FPI is Reading
AfPak Channel on Foreign Policy
AsiaEye from Project 2049
Breitbart
AEI Center for Defense Studies
Contentions
Critical Threats Project from AEI
Democracy Digest Bulletin
Drudge Report
The Enterprise Blog
The Foundry
Foreign Affairs
Institute for the Study of War
Josh Rogin’s The Cable
Long War Journal
The Majlis
Mike Allen’s Playbook
National Review’s The Corner
The New Republic's Entanglements
One Free Korea
Policy Review
Politico’s Arena
Project on Middle East Democracy
RFE/RL’s blogs
RealClearPolitics
RealClearWorld
Laura Rozen on Foreign Policy
Shadow Government
Small Wars Journal
Wall Street Journal’s Opinion Journal
Washington Post PostPartisan
Weekly Standard
World Affairs