FPI Bulletin: Obama Hasn't "Won" on Libya
Getty Images
From FPI Executive Director Jamie M.
Fly and Policy Analyst Evan Moore
In this morning’s Washington Post, columnist E. J. Dionne laments,
“It’s remarkable how reluctant Obama’s opponents are to acknowledge that
despite all the predictions that his policy of limited engagement could never
work, it actually did.”
The reality is that Libya is a pyrrhic victory for the Obama administration. If
anything, the past five months have only served to underscore the necessity of
robust American leadership in world affairs, and presidential leadership at
home. Both were sorely lacking in the case of Libya.
The administration’s mixed messages and initial handwringing about Libya’s
revolution in March confused allies as well as intervention skeptics such as
China and Russia. Its incoherent legal case for the eventual intervention and
the mismatch between the goal of removing Qaddafi and the narrower mandate of
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 led to bipartisan condemnation
of the administration’s actions by Congress.
The U.S. decision to limit its involvement several weeks into the conflict
caused cash-strapped European governments to run short on ammunition and
scramble to effectively deploy their limited military resources. A more robust
use of force during this initial period, including greater use of ground-attack
aircraft such as AC-130s and A-10s, could have completely crippled Qaddafi’s
forces at the onset. The president’s declaration that there would not be any
American boots on the ground left allied special forces on their own to assist
the untrained rebel forces and guide NATO air strikes. The participation of
American special operators would have undoubtedly put the alliance in a
stronger position to pressure Qaddafi. All of these actions allowed Qaddafi to
stay in power for months longer than necessary, resulting in countless
unnecessary deaths.
Moreover, while President Obama called for Qaddafi to go on March 3, it was not
until July 15 that the United States officially recognized the Transitional
National Council (TNC) as Libya’s legitimate governing authority. Doing so
earlier might have bolstered the TNC’s international credibility and led to an
earlier resolution of the effort to allow frozen Qaddafi assets to be handed
over to them.
Apart from his initial address to the nation on March 28, the president made
very little effort to explain the strategic rationale of the Libyan operation
to a skeptical Congress and American public. The zenith of the political uproar
came in late June, when the House of Representative voted not to authorize the
operations in Libya, but did not cut off current funding. While the actual
impact of those votes was negligible, the message being sent to friends and
foes alike was one of waning American resolve.
Despite the president’s indecisiveness on Libya, the wave of revolutions in the
Middle East continues. The people of Libya now have the opportunity to chart a
better course for their future in part because of U.S. assistance, but also, to
some extent, in spite of the president’s approach. As for Mr. Dionne, he should
recognize the difference between winning well and winning ugly.
- Originally posted on The Corner, a blog of National Review Online
- Download a copy of this Bulletin in PDF format
Additional FPI Resources
- Foreign Policy Experts Urge House Republicans to Support U.S. Operations in Libya – Open Letter – Foreign Policy Initiative – June 20, 2011
- FPI Fact Sheet: The Case for Intervention in Libya – Foreign Policy Initiative – March 30, 2011
- Foreign Policy Experts Urge President to Take Action to Halt Violence in Libya – Open Letter – Foreign Policy Initiative – March 15, 2011
- Libya is a Problem from Hell – FPI Executive Director Jamie Fly – Foreign Policy – March 16, 2011
- Foreign Policy Experts Urge President to Take Action to Halt Violence in Libya – Open Letter – Foreign Policy Initiative – February 25, 2011
Suggested Reading
- Libya's Problems are Far From Over – Max Boot – Los Angeles Times – August 24, 2011
- U.S. Action Helped Cause of Freedom in Libya – Editorial – Washington Post – August 23, 2011
- Lessons of Libya – Editorial – Wall Street Journal (subscription required) – August 23, 2011
- Helping Libya Become a Stable, Independent Nation – Daniel Serwer – Washington Post – August 23, 2011
- A Thrilling Spectacle in Tripoli – Fouad Ajami – Wall Street Journal – August 23, 2011
- Gaddafi’s Fall Will Renew the Arab Spring – Philip Zelikow – Financial Times – August 23, 2011
- Libya Now Needs Boots on the Ground – Richard Haass – Financial Times – August 23, 2011
- Don’t Call it a Comeback – Kurt Volker – Foreign Policy – August 23, 2011
- Five Reasons it is Premature to Declare Mission Accomplished for Obama's Libya Strategy – Peter Feaver – Shadow Government – August 22, 2011
SIGN UP
Sign up to receive FPI emails, including the FPI Overnight Brief, a concise daily compendium of essential foreign policy information and analysis.
Featured Video
Follow FPI
FPI on your site
FPI is Reading
- AfPak Channel on Foreign Policy
- AsiaEye from Project 2049
- Breitbart
- AEI Center for Defense Studies
- Checkpoint Washington
- Contentions
- The Commentator
- Critical Threats Project from AEI
- Democracy Digest Bulletin
- Drudge Report
- Economist's Eastern Approaches
- Elliott Abrams Pressure Points