- Home
- Topics
- Publications
- Multimedia
- Briefings
- Press Room
- Events
- Young Professionals
FPI Bulletin: Now is not the time to show a lack of resolve on Libya
June 2, 2011 | FPI Bulletin
Getty Images
From FPI Executive Director Jamie Fly and Policy Advisor Robert
Zarate
Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi is facing growing international pressure,
thanks to continuing NATO airstrikes, high-level defections from his regime,
multilateral sanctions, and a rebel movement that is increasingly organized and
capable. Now is not the time for the United States to show a lack of
resolve, thereby emboldening Qaddafi. Yet several congressional proposals
to protest or preemptively end U.S. military involvement in Libya risk doing
just that.
Invoking the 1973 War Powers
Resolution, some Members of Congress are suggesting that U.S.
military involvement in Libya is unconstitutional. By so doing, they are
dredging up a polarizing and intractable debate over the power of Congress to
declare war and the President’s constitutional authority to act as America’s
commander-in-chief.
As Congress considers its response to the U.S. intervention in Libya, it is
important to recall that both Democratic and Republican Presidents have
undertaken military actions of the sort taken in Libya without formal
declarations from the Legislative Branch—most recently during the 1999 conflict
in Kosovo. As Jack Goldsmith, who headed the Justice Department’s Office
of Legal Counsel during the Bush administration, wrote in Slate:
“The president, under his commander-in-chief and other executive powers, has very broad discretion to use military force in the absence of congressional authorization. Presidents have done this, in military actions large and small, over 100 times, since the beginning of the republic.”
Congress has a responsibility to hold the Executive Branch accountable.
And, to be sure, the Obama administration should have done more—and clearly
should do much more—to consult with and explain to Members of Congress the
strategic and moral imperatives of U.S. involvement in Libya. That said,
there is a strong legal and historical argument that President Obama’s
intervention in Libya is both within his constitutional authority as
commander-in-chief and consistent with the practice of previous presidents of
both political parties.
Unfortunately, the constitutional debate obscures the key point: It is in
America’s interest to see the Libyan people liberated from Qaddafi’s tyrannical
rule. Libya’s neighbors, Egypt and Tunisia, are attempting to consolidate
the gains of their own revolutions. Elsewhere in the region, people are
taking to the streets, risking their livelihoods and lives to stand up to their
repressive rulers. By showing continued resolve against dictators like
Qaddafi, the United States can help the peoples of the Middle East and North
Africa to move towards moderate and representative governments that respect
both human rights and the rule of law.
That is why the President said in his March 28th address to the
nation: “There is no question that Libya—and the world—would be better off with
Qaddafi out of power.” Qaddafi authorized the indiscriminate use of
lethal force against his own people. As a sponsor of terrorism, Qaddafi is
responsible for the deaths of U.S. servicemen in the bombing of a Berlin
discotheque in 1986, and nearly 200 American civilians in the bombing of Pan Am
Flight 103 in 1988. Qaddafi’s regime also pursued weapons of mass
destruction before forfeiting key elements of its programs in 2003.
U.S. military actions against Qaddafi’s regime have been limited.
Operation Odyssey Dawn prevented a humanitarian catastrophe in the rebel
stronghold of Benghazi, and cleared the way for establishing a NATO-enforced
“no-fly zone” to protect Libya civilians. Yet even these limited actions
have produced significant results. Qaddafi’s military forces have been
weakened considerably. On Wednesday, Libyan oil minister Shokri Ghanem
joined a long list of senior officials to defect from the regime. With
NATO assistance, anti-Qaddafi rebels have lifted the siege of Misurata in
western Libya and secured eastern Libya against attack from Qaddafi loyalists.
Meanwhile, Qaddafi’s support among the populace in Tripoli appears to be
wearing thin.
Admittedly, many supporters of the intervention have not been pleased with the
way President Obama has handled Libya, given the mixed messages sent by senior
administration officials and the unwillingness of the President to commit to a
more robust U.S. role. But at the end of the day, it is in America’s
national, strategic, and moral interest to see this operation through. A
world without Qaddafi is a world in which free nations and free peoples will be
more secure.
FPI Resources
- FPI Fact Sheet: The Case for Intervention in Libya – Foreign Policy Initiative – March 30, 2011
- Foreign Policy Experts Urge President to Take Action to Halt Violence in Libya – Open Letter – March 15, 2011
- Foreign Policy Experts Urge President to Take Action to Halt Violence in Libya – Open Letter – February 25, 2011
- [Video] – FPI Director William Kristol Discussed the Afghanistan War and the Situation in Libya on the May 31, 2011 Edition of Special Report w/ Bret Baier – Fox News Channel – May 31, 2011
- In Libya, Responsibility is Unavoidable – FPI Executive Director Jamie Fly – The Corner – March 28, 2011
- Give War A Chance – FPI Director William Kristol – The Weekly Standard – March 25, 2011
- A Moral Obligation to Intervene – FPI Executive Director Jamie Fly – USA Today – March 3, 2011
Suggested Reading
- Congress and the Myth of the 60-Day Clock – Stephen Rademaker – Washington Post – May 24, 2011
- What the Libyan Resistance Needs - Mahmoud Gebril ElWarfally – New York Times – May 13, 2011
- In Libya, Time to Nourish Democracy’s Roots – Fred Hiatt – Washington Post – May 12, 2011
- Finish the Job – Lt. Gen. James M. Dubik (USA, ret.) – New York Times – April 26, 2011
- In Libya, Regime Change Should Be the Goal – Sens. Joseph Lieberman (ID-CT) and John McCain (R-AZ) – Wall Street Journal (subscription required) – April 1, 2011
- It’s Time to Arm the Libyan Rebels – Michael O’Hanlon – USA Today – March 30, 2011
- Antiwar Senator, War-Powers President – John Yoo – Wall Street Journal – March 25, 2011
- The Campaign Against Libya is Constitutional – Jack Goldsmith – Slate – March 21, 2011
- We Intervene – Leon Wieseltier – The New Republic – March 21, 2011
SIGN UP
Sign up to receive FPI emails, including the FPI Overnight Brief, a concise daily compendium of essential foreign policy information and analysis.
Featured Video
Follow FPI
FPI on your site
FPI is Reading
- AfPak Channel on Foreign Policy
- AsiaEye from Project 2049
- Breitbart
- AEI Center for Defense Studies
- Checkpoint Washington
- Contentions
- The Commentator
- Critical Threats Project from AEI
- Democracy Digest Bulletin
- Drudge Report
- Economist's Eastern Approaches
- Elliott Abrams Pressure Points